• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Dubious distinction: Long Beach tops SF on unaffordable list

Dubious distinction: Long Beach tops SF on unaffordable list
Long Beach (iStock)

Call it counter-intuitive to the extreme, but Long Beach holds a dubious distinction based on data showing it edges out San Francisco on a national list of most unaffordable housing markets.

The statistic comes from a report published Wednesday by the website RealtyHop. The analysis is based on median household incomes in the country’s 100 most populous cities compared with local median listing prices pulled from its own database.

The just-published December index finds that the average household in Long Beach would have to fork over nearly two-thirds of earnings — 65.5 percent — toward monthly mortgage payments and taxes on a median-priced home in the city of 470,000.

“One thing about housing affordability is that over time, people who can no longer afford expensive housing will slowly migrate to smaller cities close to the metro core, so in this case Long Beach — being within the Los Angeles County and being close to Los Angeles — is definitely seeing the same impact,” said Shane Lee, a data analyst with RealtyHop.

The home ownership burden facing residents of Long Beach was slightly higher than the ratio for notoriously expensive San Francisco, where residents would have to allocate 64.4 percent of income toward home ownership. San Francisco, which last month ranked fifth-most unaffordable, fell to seventh. In recent months the two cities have been swapping positions: In the October index, Long Beach also ranked fifth, only to be overtaken by San Francisco in last month’s index.

Long Beach, just 25 miles south of Downtown L.A., is often overshadowed by its neighbor but ranks as California’s seventh largest city. And while home prices there remain lower than those in much of the rest of L.A. County, the port city is also facing its own escalating affordability crisis, prompting its city council to recently consider amending its housing laws. 

The city’s unaffordability stems from both sides of the equation — rising home prices and relatively low incomes. RealtyHop calculated that the city’s current median listing price is $739,000, a figure that’s gone up approximately $15,000 since late summer and equates to a monthly cost of $3,439. At the same time, the city’s median household income is just over $63,000.

In San Diego, by comparison, RealtyHop calculates a higher median home price, of $845,000, but also a higher median household income of around $80,000. (San Diego ranked 11th most unaffordable, with the average household forced to pay 59.3 percent of earnings toward home ownership.)

San Francisco’s figures are more extreme, with a median listing price $1.33 million and a median household income of $112,000.

Compared to a month earlier, most cities on the list became slightly more unaffordable, thanks to rising home prices. For the sixth month in a row New York ranked as the most unaffordable housing market, with a median home price of $980,000 and a median household income of $64,000, which equates to a whopping 84 percent of income eaten up by housing costs.

Miami, with significantly lower home prices and salaries, again ranked second most unaffordable.

Los Angeles, with a median home price of $915,000, ranked third. The homeownership burdens in those cities came out only slightly lower, at 83.2 and 81.2 percent.

California, unsurprisingly, figured heavily in the rankings: Oakland, Anaheim, Irvine, Santa Ana, San Jose, Chula Vista, Fremont and Riverside also scored in the top 20 most unaffordable.

“Since Covid, California has gotten even more expensive,” said Lee. “It’s not going to go down for the time being.”

At the other end of the spectrum, RealtyHop calculated that the country’s most affordable housing market was Wichita, Kansas, where the median home goes for just $150,000 and the median household income is $52,600. That means an average family there would have $770 in monthly housing costs, or 17.6 percent of income. Detroit, where the median listing is $80,000, ranked second.

Read more
  • Poll: Majority of LA County residents support duplex law
  • SoCal’s “Space Beach” is ready for liftoff
  • California claims lion’s share of 100 priciest zips
[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]

The post Dubious distinction: Long Beach tops SF on unaffordable list appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 02 December 2021
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Rexford adds biggest industrial property in Simi Valley →← Takeoff! Rocket startup signs for 100K sf in El Segundo
  • Recent Posts

    • Feds to sell landmark Spring Street Courthouse in DTLA May 14, 2025
    • Rams owner Stan Kroenke eyes Olympics broadcast center, film studio in Inglewood May 14, 2025
    • Eaton fire victims, others claim insurance adjuster stole repair money  May 14, 2025
    • State Farm approved for 17% rate hike amid California “insurance crisis” May 13, 2025
    • Optimus scores $22M refinancing for South LA shopping center May 13, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM