• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

L.A. Alliance doubles down on federal lawsuit over homelessness solution

L.A. Alliance for Human Rights' Elizabeth Mitchell (Getty, L.A. Alliance for Human Rights)
L.A. Alliance for Human Rights’ Elizabeth Mitchell (Getty, L.A. Alliance for Human Rights)

A coalition of Downtown property owners, residents and homeless individuals will move forward with a federal lawsuit against Los Angeles County to demand a solution to widespread homelessness.

The L.A. Alliance for Human Rights said in a court filing it anticipates a second amended complaint against the county “will significantly streamline the case” – if and when the court signs off on a recent settlement with the City of Los Angeles, the Los Angeles Daily News reported.

On April 1, the city settled its portion of the March 2020 lawsuit, leaving the county open as a defendant.

Under the settlement, the city of L.A. agreed to spend as much as $3 billion over the next five years to create up to 16,000 beds or housing units for the homeless — enough to shelter 60 percent of its homeless residents. Los Angeles has 36,000 homeless residents; the county has 66,000.

City officials said the county should be responsible for housing and providing services for those living on the street with serious mental illnesses, physical maladies and drug addiction – since the county has medical and mental health facilities, and the city doesn’t.

By shifting responsibility to the county for sheltering the sick and vulnerable, the city reduced the number of homeless people it would have to house.

In February, U.S. District Judge David O. Carter ordered a series of mandatory settlement talks after city and county representatives indicated they had no sense of when or if they might strike a deal that would lead to an agreement. A few weeks ago, the county withdrew from the multiple hours of discussions.

Carter has pointed to a “historic schism” between the city and county that had apparently frustrated an eventual settlement. The two jurisdictions were supposed to reach a compromise on funding and other issues before a final agreement with the L.A. Alliance.

An attorney for the L.A. Alliance, Elizabeth Mitchell, told reporters the county has “refused to participate in this settlement.”
“We will not stop working to hold the county accountable,” she said. “This crisis is too big for any one branch of government. The county is not getting out of its obligations.”

The lawsuit brought by the L.A. Alliance initially aimed to force local governments to “comprehensively” solve the homelessness crisis in Skid Row, an area in Downtown L.A. The suit was then expanded to include homeless populations along freeways, then to the unhoused population at large.

Skip Miller, outside counsel for the county, has argued the county should not be held accountable for Downtown L.A. because “the city has primary jurisdiction.” On April 1, he said the lawsuit “has no merit with regard to the county.”
“It is between the plaintiffs and the city, and we’re glad they settled,” he said. “We intend to litigate and win this case. The county is more than doing its job and doing everything possible to address homelessness without stigmatizing it as a crime.”

Read more
  • LA Homeless Services Authority could be cut altogether
  • City wants to toss lawsuit forcing LA to house thousands of homeless
  • LA councilmember — and mayoral candidate — seeks controversial homeless ballot measure

[LA Daily News] – Dana Bartholomew

[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]

The post L.A. Alliance doubles down on federal lawsuit over homelessness solution appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 08 April 2022
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Irvine-based developer buys 90K sf building in Orange County →← Price on Steve Wynn’s Beverly Hills’ estate slashed again
  • Recent Posts

    • Is CEQA win first shot at a broader overhaul for resi market?   July 5, 2025
    • Hankey finances bargain-bin hotel buy near SF’s Union Square July 3, 2025
    • Industry group flails as CEQA adjustments hit California builders unevenly July 3, 2025
    • Orange County office tower sells for discounted $19M July 3, 2025
    • City to deploy $425M of “mansion tax” money in record spending plan July 3, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • July 2025
      • June 2025
      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM