• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Santa Monica puts rent control measure on November ballot

Dan Yukelson and Mayor Sue Himmelrich (LinkedIn, Getty Images)
Dan Yukelson and Mayor Sue Himmelrich (LinkedIn, Getty Images)

After weeks of public rhetoric — and spirited opposition from landlords — the Santa Monica City Council voted unanimously on Wednesday in favor of a November ballot measure that would reduce the city’s maximum annual rent increases.

“One sentence,” Councilman Phil Brock said after the vote: “I hope all of our rent control renters will sleep better this evening.”

The council’s action, which came during a special session Wednesday evening, means that Santa Monica voters will decide the hot button issue at the city’s Nov. 8 election. The referendum will ask whether the city should amend a section of its charter to reduce the maximum potential annual increase from 6 percent to 3 percent for rent-controlled units.

The city’s rent increase caps are determined by a Rent Control Board and tied to the Consumer Price Index; over the past couple decades, since the original rent control language was codified, the 6 percent ceiling, up to a maximum $140 monthly increase, has only rarely been reached. But it came into play in June amid soaring inflation. The measure would also include a provision that allows the Rent Control Board to freeze hikes altogether under declared emergencies.

“We’ve reached 6 percent only a few times, but that’s even more reason why a 3 percent cap is a reasonable and predictable metric for people to be able to live” and plan against,” Mayor Pro Tem Kristin McCowan said during the meeting. “Whereas the 6 percent cap … was always looming on the horizon. People didn’t expect it to ever happen, and then it happened.”

Dan Yukelson, the outspoken president of Apartment Association of Greater Los Angeles, the region’s landlord advocacy group, said he wasn’t surprised by the board’s move but was still outraged at what he characterized as a local government that had no business sense and was in the pocket of tenant rights groups.

“It just figures that the City of Santa Monica would come out with the worst outcome for property owners and put people out of business,” he said. “This city is, has been and always will be Soviet Monica.”

Santa Monica, which ranks among Southern California’s wealthiest cities, has around 15,000 households that qualify as rent burdened, a term that typically applies to households that pay more than 30 percent of income toward rent, according to data cited in the City Council agenda. That figure represents nearly a third of the city’s renter households. Santa Monica also has 10,000 households that qualify as severely rent burdened, meaning they pay more than 50 percent of income toward rent.

A recent report from the rental site Zumper calculated the city’s median rent for a one-bedroom apartment at $2,920, the highest of any city in L.A. County.

The council’s Wednesday decision came after weeks of passionate discussions and delays related to the pending ballot measure, including an alternate proposal, ultimately shelved, that would have kept the 6 percent cap for some tenants but had many tenants seeing no rent increases at all.

Much of Wednesday’s meeting, which lasted more than three and a half hours, was devoted to a discussion of a possible “sunset clause” for the cap reduction, with supporters arguing such a clause would ultimately produce a more complete debate about how the city handles rent control in the long term.

“On the other side of the same problem is a message that we’ll be sending to the small mom-and-pop property owners,” said Councilman Oscar de la Torre, arguing for a sunset. “And those property owners, we need them to stay in business. … A sunset gives us an opportunity to have a robust discussion.”

“I can tell you what I’ve heard is that renters are very concerned about any sunset at all,” countered Councilmember Gleam Davis. “Because what it does is say, at some point, if we don’t adopt something, we’ll revert back to this 6 percent system we have right now.”

The council moved to initiate a more formal discussion on further reforms with “all the stakeholders,” including renters, in mid 2023.

[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]

The post Santa Monica puts rent control measure on November ballot appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 04 August 2022
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Villa Firenze cuts price by $41M →← Duke Realty shells out nearly $100M for empty land in the Inland Empire
  • Recent Posts

    • Hoteliers sound the alarm on looming distress  May 24, 2025
    • Growth markets see retail boom even with tariff uncertainty May 24, 2025
    • Westchester resi project gets city OK after union drops objection May 23, 2025
    • WATCH: ‘Father of CMBS’ Ethan Penner to run for governor of California May 23, 2025
    • Fashion Island office fetches $756 psf May 23, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM