• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Angels Baseball threatens suit, halts fire station project

City Attorney Rob Fabela and Attorney Allen Abshez with the Angel Stadium at 2000 Gene Autry Way in Anaheim (Getty, City of Anaheim, LOEB)
City Attorney Rob Fabela and Attorney Allen Abshez with the Angel Stadium at 2000 Gene Autry Way in Anaheim (Getty, City of Anaheim, LOEB)

The Angels lease of the 151-acre Angel Stadium apparently has no room for a fire station.

The city has halted construction of the fire station at the city-owned stadium after Angels Baseball threatened to file a lawsuit, the Orange County Register reported.

Attorney Allen Abshez, representing Angels Baseball and team owner Arte Moreno’s SRB Management firm, fired off a letter in late September saying the team’s stadium lease doesn’t include a fire station and to build it would violate the terms of the agreement, which lasts through 2029.

So the city responded by saying it would halt work on the fire station, but would proceed with designing the firehouse “as it sees fit,” according to an Oct. 27 letter by City Attorney Rob Fabela.

The fire station dispute is one of two legal issues that resulted from the city’s decision to block a $320 million stadium deal – and both appear at a stalemate.

The other issue is whether Anaheim owes SRB Management $5 million in cost recovery because it voided the sale.

The city and SRB were on the verge of closing escrow on the stadium sale last spring when the news broke that then-Mayor Harry Sidhu was under federal investigation for allegedly passing confidential information to Angels Baseball officials in hope of soliciting $1 million for his reelection campaign.

Sidhu, who resigned in May, has not been charged with any crime. Paul Meyer, his attorney, said Sidhu did not leak secret information and that a “fair and thorough investigation” would clear him.

In June, Abshez told the city SRB would file a $5 million claim to recoup money it spent putting the deal together.

The city still hasn’t determined whether it will pay, according to the Register. Anaheim spokesman Mike Lyster said city officials agreed to pause any site preparation or early-stage construction on the fire station to try to untangle the two disputes.

The now-defunct stadium deal would have reserved a small piece of the stadium parking lots for a fire station that would serve homes and businesses in the area.

While the city reserves the right to build the fire station, Lyster said, “we think it is best to separate those two issues and to focus on the claim that has been put forth.”

And the $5 million? If evidence comes to light that the former mayor did improperly share information with the baseball team, the validity of the entire deal — including a clause allowing the stadium buyer to recover $5 million if the city defaulted — could be in question, Lyster said.

SRB spokeswoman Marie Garvey has said the company and the team “acted in good faith throughout their dealings with the city of Anaheim.”

— Dana Bartholomew

[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]
Read more
  • Angels owner seeks $5M to cover costs on nixed stadium deal
  • Anaheim scuttles $320-million sale of Angel Stadium
  • Feds probe Anaheim mayor over Angel Stadium sale

The post Angels Baseball threatens suit, halts fire station project appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 02 November 2022
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
OC cities hustle to avoid builder’s remedy “travesty” →← Hancock Park estate where Muhammad Ali lived for sale
  • Recent Posts

    • Hoteliers sound the alarm on looming distress  May 24, 2025
    • Growth markets see retail boom even with tariff uncertainty May 24, 2025
    • Westchester resi project gets city OK after union drops objection May 23, 2025
    • WATCH: ‘Father of CMBS’ Ethan Penner to run for governor of California May 23, 2025
    • Fashion Island office fetches $756 psf May 23, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM