• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Brokers tell clients to sell before transfer tax deadline

Newmark's Kevin Shannon, Marcus & Millichap's Jordan Asheghian and Tony Azzi, Stepp Commercial's Travis Traweek and Waterford's John Drachman (Newmark, Marcus & Millichap, Stepp Commercial, Waterford Property Company)
Newmark’s Kevin Shannon, Marcus & Millichap’s Jordan Asheghian and Tony Azzi, Stepp Commercial’s Travis Traweek and Waterford’s John Drachman (Newmark, Marcus & Millichap, Stepp Commercial, Waterford Property Company)

Thinking about selling a commercial property? Do it now.

That’s the advice brokers are giving to their clients across the board, after the city of Los Angeles passed a new transfer tax that would apply to all commercial and residential properties that sell for more than $10 million.

“If you plan on selling in the near future, if you can avoid the tax, you’re going to want to avoid it,” said Newmark’s Kevin Shannon.

On April 1, sellers of commercial property will face an additional 4 percent tax on any sales above $5 million, according to an L.A. ordinance on track to pass as a ballot proposition. Any sales above $10 million will face a 5.5 percent tax. Any revenues generated by the taxes will skirt the city’s general fund and go straight into a fund for affordable housing development and rent relief measures.

The ULA measure is a terrible law

And the spec home part isnt even the worst part. In Development deals, taxes are functionally paid up front, lowering existing land values

So that one-story strip mall is going to stay. Owner won’t sell to tear down & build housing

So dumb https://t.co/J5nDqpfYl8

— Bobby Fijan (@bobbyfijan) November 17, 2022

Commercial brokers, developers and investors interviewed by TRD shared a similar sentiment of frustration for the proposed tax. Though advertised colloquially as a “mansion tax,” the tax is set to have a profound effect on the commercial industry, with brokers suggesting it will lead to pricing reductions across the board, as interest rates have already dragged down valuations.

“It’s a perfect storm,” Travis Traweek, a broker at Stepp Commercial, said. “People already want to leave L.A., with the eviction moratorium, interest rates and rent control issues.”

“Bit of a spike”

Brokers don’t expect transactions to dry up completely after that April 1 deadline, though the number of deals are already on the decline, given rising interest rates.

“If they’re not transacting, they’re out of business,” Tony Azzi at Marcus & Millichap said of investment firms. “They can’t sit on the sidelines.”

But commercial investors may start to look elsewhere to transact. Multifamily investors, for example, may look to other cities in L.A. County, or even Orange or Riverside counties, where rents have dramatically increased over the last couple of years, Azzi said.

Though sellers will be able to avoid the tax if they sell a property before the April 1 deadline, any investor has to underwrite that extra cost into their calculations, since they’ll have to pay it when they want to cash out of the asset.

“It’s a drag on all values,” Shannon said. “It makes it harder to transact.”

The city of L.A. may see a “little bit of a spike” in transactions just before the transfer tax is implemented, but it’ll be muted, given it’s hard to get a deal done in the current rate environment, Shannon added.

But, there’s precedent for an uptick in transactions ahead of a new transfer tax. In 2019, the state of Washington implemented its own real estate excise tax — 3 percent on any sales above $3 million. Ahead of that transfer tax, Seattle saw “record velocity,” Shannon said.

“I suspect there might be a higher than average amount of sales in the city of L.A. in the first quarter than prior years,” said Patrick Schlehuber, who runs acquisitions at industrial REIT Rexford Industrial Realty, though it might not be a perfect comparison, given industrial sales have been robust since the pandemic started.

The tax also comes as office transactions have dramatically slowed, as a result of a lackluster return to the office, declining office values and stubbornly high vacancy rates.

“It hurts every asset class,” Shannon said.

Finding a loophole

Investors are already trying to figure out ways to skirt the transfer tax, by transferring properties through a joint venture or various LLC measures, according to sources familiar with the ordinance.

Law firm Gibson Dunn has affirmed that L.A. is likely to interpret the tax as “applying to a transfer of interests in a legal entity that results in a change in ownership of real property,” meaning a transfer from one LLC to another.

Whether the tax will apply to foreclosures and deeds in lieu of foreclosures still remains to be seen, according to Gibson Dunn. Both those types of sales are exempt from California’s state transfer tax.

“Sellers might get creative,” Jordan Asheghian at Marcus & Millichap said. Azzi, his partner, added that there was no guarantee and he wasn’t advocating anything illegal.

Total proceeds

Affordable housing organizations selling property may qualify for an exemption, according to the ordinance. Also, the proceeds from the tax are set to go towards “purchasing existing buildings” and “cutting red tape” to create more affordable housing.

“We’re for increasing funding measures for affordable housing, and this bill passing should create that,” said John Drachman, a co-founder of Waterford Property Company, which develops affordable, workforce and market-rate housing. “But it’s nuanced.”

It all depends on how many sales actually go through, Drachman said, and how much revenue is actually generated.

The city of L.A. is projecting the tax will generate between $600 million and $1.1 billion annually — an amount that will “fluctuate” depending on the number of property sales. And if sales dip — as they already are — the city may see revenue for new affordable housing programs dwindle.

Based on 2021 to 2022 real estate sales, one of the most active real estate years, the ordinance could generate around $900 million a year in revenue.

This year’s transactions won’t hit close to last year’s, brokers said.

And some investors, particularly ones that don’t have experience investing in L.A. or California, may shy away from deals in the future.

“It’s not going to attract additional investment in L.A.,” Shannon said of the tax. “It’s another negative factor.”

Read more
  • Transfer tax in LA, Santa Monica on track to pass at polls
  • LA transfer tax could impact luxury home segment
  • Caruso concedes after $100M campaign for LA mayor
[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]

The post Brokers tell clients to sell before transfer tax deadline appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 21 November 2022
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Shammas family plans New Ford dealership in DTLA →← Kimco Realty eyes urban village at San Gabriel Valley mall
  • Recent Posts

    • Hoteliers sound the alarm on looming distress  May 24, 2025
    • Growth markets see retail boom even with tariff uncertainty May 24, 2025
    • Westchester resi project gets city OK after union drops objection May 23, 2025
    • WATCH: ‘Father of CMBS’ Ethan Penner to run for governor of California May 23, 2025
    • Fashion Island office fetches $756 psf May 23, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM