• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Beverly Hills brokers make sense of NAR settlement

A home nestled high up in the zigzags of sprawling Beverly Hills estates played backdrop last week for some of the area’s top agents to debate, hypothesize and agonize over the latest seismic developments around residential real estate. 

Broker Zach Goldsmith of The Agency Beverly Hills was the host of the panel featuring luxury residential brokers Josh Flagg, Branden and Rayni Williams, and Aaron Kirman, which evolved into an agitated, and at times unruly, discussion on the impact of National Association of Realtors settlement on the business of being a broker. 

Held at the home of Andrew Shanfeld, who runs real estate investment firm Carolwood, the event attracted around 40 people. The familiar faces in the front row included Parker Beatty, an agent at Compass, along with Farrah Britanny and Ben Belack, both brokers at The Agency and cast members of the Netflix series “Buying Beverly Hills.” 

The event came days after NAR agreed to settle antitrust lawsuits over broker commissions in a deal that will cost the organization $418 million in damages to resolve claims from home sellers — and some key rule changes that open buyer brokers’ earnings up to negotiation. 

“How are we going to get paid?”

To paraphrase Leo Tolstoy, happy brokers are all alike, but every unhappy broker is unhappy in their own way. 

The rule changes as specified in the settlement agreement breaks open what was previously an assumed cost for sellers to compensate buyer brokers. 

The event hit on much of the uncertainty around what the rules, slated to take effect in July, will mean in practice for day-to-day operations like signing the buyer’s contracts, hosting open houses and other logistics to turn a profit in a new environment.

“How are we going to prove our worth as buyer’s agents?” asked Kirman. “I see that much like listing agents, when we go to list a house, we have to prove our worth. It’s going to be the same with buyers now — it’s not going to be a free-for-all.“

Most who spoke at the event projected the fallout from the NAR settlement would be profound, but disagreed about what the new rules will mean for their operations, how to adjust their business models and long-term impacts on the industry. 

“The federal government is going to want buyers to have representation. It’s a good thing, there’s no way around that,” Kirman noted. “The question becomes, how are we going to get paid?”

The answer: buyer-broker agreements, according to Kirman. 

“This is going to be the new system,” Kirman said. “We didn’t have buyer-broker agreements that were used very often; soon they are going to be used very often — the buyers are going to need to have an advocate on their side.”

Kirman is already working to implement the agreement at his firm. But beyond agreeing that brokers are likely on the edge of contending with a new reality to conduct daily business, some questions remained about the new logistics involved in working with brokers. 

“I’m confused about the buyer’s contract. I think it’s super fucked,” said Sharona Alperin, an agent at Sotheby’s International Realty specializing in Beverly Hills. She added it was “just kind of fucking degrading to ask from your buyers.”

A wave of change crashing on residential real estate 

Branden Williams described the NAR settlement as a part of a profound existential threat to the real estate industry, alongside the Measure ULA transfer taxes, demographic shifts, inflation and corporations fleeing California.  

“Now everybody’s getting squeezed every which way: Attorneys have always thought we made too much money, business managers — they’re pissed,” he said. 

At one point, he compared the new plight of the real estate brokers to what happened to stockbrokers’ compensation with the arrival of electronic trading platforms like E-Trade. His list of complaints wasn’t limited to the NAR settlement; it also included the increasing minimum wage and inevitable arrival of robots.

Some brokers agreed with many of his concerns, even the most seemingly alarmist parts of his forecast. 

On the other end of the spectrum was Flagg, who said he did not anticipate dramatic changes to his business and doesn’t planning on lowering his commission fees.

The changes to some of the longest-held practices in the industry come amid a challenging few years for the residential market for brokers across the country. Logistics and new agreements aside, one resounding takeaway is the shifts, on top of already tight market conditions, will likely spell more competition for the industry. 

“The fittest will survive and do great, and a lot of people will probably be eliminated from the business,” Kirman said.

Read more

National


“Everything changes now”: Here’s what NAR’s $418M settlement means for broker commissions 
“Everything changes now”: Here’s what NAR’s $418M settlement means for broker commissions 

San Francisco


Sales commissions to shrink after NAR ruling, agency heads say
Sales commissions to shrink after NAR ruling, agency heads say

National


The winners and losers in NAR’s historic settlement 
The winners and losers in NAR’s historic settlement 

The post Beverly Hills brokers make sense of NAR settlement appeared first on The Real Deal.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 10 April 2024
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
State Farm targets wealthy areas of LA for policy non-renewals →← Alon Abady pays $17M for Beverly Hills home, puts it on rental market
  • Recent Posts

    • Hoteliers sound the alarm on looming distress  May 24, 2025
    • Growth markets see retail boom even with tariff uncertainty May 24, 2025
    • Westchester resi project gets city OK after union drops objection May 23, 2025
    • WATCH: ‘Father of CMBS’ Ethan Penner to run for governor of California May 23, 2025
    • Fashion Island office fetches $756 psf May 23, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM