• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

WeWork revises non-compete agreements following settlement with NY AG

From left: Barbara Underwood and Adam Neumann (Credit: Twitter and Getty Images)

The New York Attorney General’s office has reached a settlement with WeWork over non-compete agreements which the company had required almost all its employees to sign.

The overly broad agreements barred employees from working for competitors after leaving WeWork regardless of their salaries, responsibilities and knowledge of confidential information, according to Attorney General Barbara Underwood. Her office’s investigation of the company found that it had made employees at almost all locations across the country sign one of these agreements as a condition of employment.

The settlement, which was first reported by NPR, will release 800 WeWork employees in New York from their non-compete agreements. WeWork will also adopt this policy nationwide, which will release more than 600 additional employees from the agreements. The state’s AG office worked with Illinois’ Attorney General, which had also been investigating WeWork’s non-compete agreements, to coordinate a resolution.

Additionally, roughly 1,800 employees — about 1,400 in New York — will now be bound by less restrictive non-compete agreements. Their non-compete period will drop from one year to six months after they stop working at WeWork, and the geographic restriction will drop from any place where the company operates to a 15-mile radius of WeWork branches that practice the type of work the employee did. Employees will also now only be barred from specific business lines in which they worked.

WeWork must notify all current and former employees who left within the past year about these changes and send the Attorney General’s office semiannual reports for the next two years about changes to or uses of its non-compete agreements.

Although New York allows non-compete clauses, they cannot be broader than necessary to protect the employer’s legitimate interests.

WeWork released a statement saying they had been working with the New York attorney general for the past two years to review the company’s non-compete agreements and was already revising them.

Underwood described the settlement in a statement as “a key step forward for WeWork’s thousands of employees in New York and across the country.”

Underwood’s office announced the settlement around noon on Tuesday, just three hours after WeWork announced it had become the largest office tenant in Manhattan with 5.3 million square feet of space. The company has 60 total locations in New York City, 50 of which are in Manhattan.

WeWork has signed multiple new leases in recent months, including 18,200 square feet at 231 11th Avenue and 25,000 square feet at 609 Greenwich Street. The company said its 258,344-square-foot lease at 21 Penn Plaza is what pushed it into the top spot.

New York City Public Advocate Letitia James won the Democratic primary for New York attorney general on Thursday. She will face Republican Keith Wofford in the November general election to replace Underwood, who took over the position from Eric Schneiderman in May.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 18 September 2018
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Details revealed for 97-unit mixed-use project in Long Beach →← L’Oreal signs major lease in unincorporated Kern County
  • Recent Posts

    • Kravets office portfolio’s $68M loan heads to special servicing June 18, 2025
    • Brentwood family puts custom home on market for $45M June 18, 2025
    • Fashion Nova’s Richard Saghian buys $32M “temporary” abode on edge of Beverly Hills June 18, 2025
    • Orange County outpaces Los Angeles in office conversions, fundamentals June 18, 2025
    • Mark Wahlberg’s former Beverly Park pad goes into contract with $68M ask June 18, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • June 2025
      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM