• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Industrial investors buoyed by strong economy and e-commerce, but wary of tariffs and interest rates

(Credit: iStock)

Boosted by e-commerce and steady economic growth, investors are shaking off their doubts over the staying power of the country’s industrial development boom.

Nearly half of investors surveyed in Real Capital Markets’ annual Industrial Investor Sentiment Report said they believe investment activity will remain steady headed into next year, and another 43 percent said they expect investment to accelerate. That’s a direct flip from last year’s survey, when 48 percent of respondents predicted an increase in investment and 43 percent said it would stay the same.

Two-thirds of investors also said they expect prices to rise on industrial properties, about the same as last year. But 38 percent of respondents said they’re bracing for price increases of 5 percent or more, up from 34 percent of those surveyed in 2017.

Developers attribute their growing appetite for warehouse and manufacturing projects to the multiplying demands of a growing e-commerce industry, and about a third of investors surveyed identified Internet sales as the No. 1 factor driving investment. But another 38 percent cited a more fundamental force — the “general strength of the economy” — as the main fuel for their optimism.

If the country keeps racking up GDP growth anywhere near the 4.2 percent annual rate registered during the second quarter this year, industrial investors have no reason to turn off the spigot, according to Jim Martell, CEO of Chicago-based warehouse developer Logistics Property Co.

“E-commerce has been a very positive disruptor for us, ever since it started up about 10 years ago,” Martell said. “But we’re also seeing our population and GDP grow, and demand for warehousing is highly correlated with the growth of GDP.”

But the survey also flagged a handful of potential hazards that should worry anyone with a stake in industrial real estate. About 28 percent of investors said tariffs on foreign products represent the most immediate threat, and others said they’re factoring the prospect of higher interest rates into their investment decisions.

The report also noted a “shortage in quality assets” when it comes to acquiring property for industrial construction, pushing developers to widen their search for promising land.

The country’s feverish pace of spec warehouse construction has raised eyebrows among some industry pros, including Equity International chairman Sam Zell, who earlier this year predicted a “market clearing” for industrial landlords.

But bullish industrial investment also means builders will likely have enough cushion to withstand a glut of vacant space if it emerges, Martell said.

“There are probably some markets getting a little over their skis, but if there’s a correction that just means a pause until we see some more absorption,” Martell said. “And even if supply and demand end up getting a little out of sync, that provides an opportunity for a more rent-sensitive user to move up into class-A buildings that may be vacant.”

A CBRE report last month highlighted the Chicago area and the Inland Empire area around Los Angeles among the most active markets for industrial and logistics leases. Southern California tallied 11.6 million square feet of deals signed, followed by Atlanta at 7 million square feet, Chicago at 6.8 million square feet, Pennsylvania’s Interstate 78/I-81 corridor at 6.8 million square feet and Dallas-Fort Worth at 5.2 million square feet.

In New York, the price per square foot of industrial properties rose by as much as 81 percent this year in some parts of the city.

And industrial markets throughout Florida are experiencing a return to pre-recession occupancy levels and rental rates, according to a Cushman & Wakefield report.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 16 October 2018
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Koreatown developer faces blowback from Planning Commission →← Hackman Capital in contract to purchase historic CBS campus
  • Recent Posts

    • Hankey finances bargain-bin hotel buy near SF’s Union Square July 3, 2025
    • Industry group flails as CEQA adjustments hit California builders unevenly July 3, 2025
    • Orange County office tower sells for discounted $19M July 3, 2025
    • City to deploy $425M of “mansion tax” money in record spending plan July 3, 2025
    • SoCal resi market sees wave of deal cancellations continue July 2, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • July 2025
      • June 2025
      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM