• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

In spite of Prop 10 defeat, housing affordability conversation continues

Public Policy Institute of California CEO Mark Baldessare, California Rental Housing Association Vice President Sid Lakireddy, and the California State Capitol

The resounding defeat of Proposition 10 has hardly silenced the debate over solutions to California’s housing crisis. But voters’ rejection of the measure says that rent control probably won’t be part of that discussion right now.

On Tuesday, nearly 62 percent of California voters voted against Prop 10, a measure to lift restrictions on rent control measures around the state.

Pollsters said the “yes” campaign couldn’t win over voters across the political spectrum who were skeptical that rent control was the right solution to the housing crisis.

“The ‘yes’ side just didn’t have the arguments to carry the day for people who may have started off supporting Prop 10,” said said Mark Baldessari, CEO of the Public Policy Institute of California. “People said housing affordability is a big problem, but [advocates] couldn’t connect the dots.”

From early on in the campaign, Prop 10 seemed destined to fail.

Around two in three respondents to a September poll by the Public Policy Institute, for example, said housing affordability was a “big problem” in their part of the state, but only a quarter said they’d vote for Prop 10.

The “no” campaign also outspent the “yes” campaign by three to one — $76 million to their $25 million. The “yes” campaign was funded almost entirely by the Hollywood-based AIDS Healthcare Foundation.

Much of the opposition’s funding came from powerful real estate players. Support for Prop 10 steadily fell leading up to Election Day, in no small part because of the real estate cash-fueled media blitz against the measure.

In the wake of their defeat, rent-control advocates said they aren’t giving up the fight. A coalition of groups called on Newsom to enact a moratorium on rent increases and seek state legislation to repeal the Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act passed in 1995, which placed limits on rent-control ordinances.

“The burden to act returns to the Governor and the legislature, who should work to represent Californians, not Wall Street landlords,” said Christina Livingston with the Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment.

Left in the defeated measure’s wake is an ongoing housing crisis. In Los Angeles, rents have skyrocketed in recent years, rising by 15.7 percent in the last year, a faster rate than any other large city in the nation.

California’s housing shortage is viewed to be the worst in the country.

With Prop 10 fresh on the electorate’s minds, California’s new legislature and incoming Gov. Gavin Newsom will be expected to address the housing crisis. Newsom said he supports expanding affordable housing tax credits to spur more development, as well as measures to promote residential development near mass transit.

Many real estate developers say the solution to the housing crisis is deregulation, which could make it easier and cheaper for developers to build housing. In Sacramento, that could mean reforming the California Environmental Quality Act, which requires the study and mitigation of the environmental impacts of development.

CEQA reform is a perennial topic in Sacramento, but reforming it won’t be easy. Local groups have used legal appeals demanding CEQA reviews to try to block or delay developments. The political difficulty of reform once prompted Gov. Jerry Brown to call it “doing the Lord’s work.”

The California Rental Housing Association, which opposed Prop 10, said in a statement on Wednesday that it was “ready to work together” with lawmakers in Sacramento and plans to send lobbyists to promote CEQA reforms and other regulatory changes. The association represents 22,000 multifamily property owners across the state.

“If there’s one positive that came out of Prop 10, it hopefully will light a fire under everyone to focus on solutions,” said Sid Lakireddy, a Sacramento area developer and vice president of the group.

In the short term, Prop 10’s defeat is expected to spur activity around L.A., where developers and investors had held back over uncertainty over the measure’s outcome.

Activity started picking up in the weeks ahead of Election Day as Prop 10 looked increasingly likely to fail, said Rick Raymundo, Marcus & Millichap Senior Managing Director of Investments.

“There was definitely money on the sidelines,” Raymundo said. “Most active clients and brokers know that it’s a nice reprieve, but rent control will come out again in some form, either in 2020 or beyond.”

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 08 November 2018
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Mortgage applications hit 4-year low as interest rates rise →← Crowdfunding startup RealtyShares to cease investing, faces mass layoffs
  • Recent Posts

    • Los Angeles proptech market well-positioned amid SF, NY domination July 15, 2025
    • No, CEQA’s not “dead,” so who wins and loses with the latest exemptions? July 15, 2025
    • Shopoff Realty gets green light for 18-acre housing project in Orange County July 15, 2025
    • Los Angeles County retail vacancy rate reaches dizzying “historic” peak July 15, 2025
    • LA signed resi contracts volume jumps over 300% as “Entourage House” finds buyer July 14, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • July 2025
      • June 2025
      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM