• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Santa Monica files criminal charges against Neil Shekhter’s son for tenant harassment

Adam Shekhter (Credit: LinkedIn and iStock)

More controversy is swirling around the Shekhter family.

A Santa Monica city attorney alleges that Adam Shekhter — Neil Shekhter’s son — and two other individuals used “unlawful tactics” to pressure tenants to vacate rent-controlled apartments.

The complaint charges Shekhter, along with Saul Reuben Robin and Edward Valentin, with tenant harassment, maintaining a public nuisance and violating zoning laws, according to a statement from the city on Jan. 9.

Three LLCs — My Suite, 1238 10th Street and 1433 Euclid — were also named as defendants in the case. Valentin, a senior development manager at WS Communities, is linked to 1238 10th Street and 1433 Euclid LLCs. Adam Shekhter, a principal at WS, controls My Suite LLC, business registration records show.

Santa Monica’s Code Enforcement division opened an investigation into two adjacent rent-controlled properties managed by My Suite in June 2018, according to the Santa Monica Daily Press. The department had noticed a flood of new units at the buildings come on the market as rentals, a rare occurrence which could suggest there had been some persuasion by the landlord.

Shekhter’s father, multifamily developer Neil Shekhter, has been in the headlines since 2014, when he became embroiled in a legal dispute with AEW Capital Management, his former joint venture partner. In November, a Los Angeles Superior Court Judge ruled in favor of AEW, stating that the firm was acting accordingly when it sold the embattled nine-property portfolio to SPI Holdings.

In the Santa Monica case, a city investigation found that Adam Shekhter and the other defendants failed to comply with Santa Monica’s tenant relocation order, and instead used illegal tactics such as buyouts and eviction notices to force rent-controlled tenants out, according to the release. It does not specify where the illegal buyouts took place.

Since 2016, more than a dozen tenants have taken buyout offers to leave the 20-unit complex on 10th Street, the Santa Monica Daily Press reported. The tenants who stayed at the property said it was being operated as corporate housing rather than affordable housing.

The city’s investigation also revealed that the defendants were operating group residential housing rental operations without proper permits, according to the statement.

Eric Rose, a spokesperson for the defendants, called the allegations “unfounded.” In an emailed statement, he said the defendants “are prepared to vigorously defend against the meritless legal action.” He added: “We are confident that if this case is in fact litigated, and all the facts are established, all parties will be fully vindicated.”

Deputy city attorney Eda Suh charged the individuals and LLCs on Dec. 18. They were ordered to appear in a Los Angeles Superior Court on Feb. 13.

The case also links to Shekhter’s father. Property records indicate Neil Shekhter, the owner of NMS Properties, bought the Santa Monica properties in 2015, acting behind 1238 10th Street LLC. The LLC is now linked to WNMS Communities, a new company that was founded in 2017 amid the legal drama surrounding the older Shekhter. WNMS manages all of the pending NMS development projects.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 14 January 2019
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Homebuilder Hovnanian, facing years-old debt, could get stock delisted →← Last call! Future City 2019 has a few slots left
  • Recent Posts

    • SoCal resi market sees wave of deal cancellations continue July 2, 2025
    • Related, Newland acquire former Forever 21 HQ in $120M deal July 2, 2025
    • LA office availability increases “amidst uncertainty over industry consolidation” July 2, 2025
    • California legislature overhauls CEQA to pave way for construction boom July 1, 2025
    • Trousdale Estates nabs neighborhood’s priciest trade this year with $32M close July 1, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • July 2025
      • June 2025
      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM