• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

City of LA nixes 600-unit Gabay resi project on appeal

From left: Council President Herb Wesson, a rendering of District Square project, and developer Arman Gabay

A Los Angeles city body has nixed the almost 600-residential unit District Square project by developers Mark Gabay and Arman Gabay four months after approving it.

Citing a lack of affordable housing set asides – and noting federal bribery charges against one of the developers – the South Los Angeles Area Planning Commission voted unanimously Tuesday to grant a project appeal from the Crenshaw Subway Coalition and Loretta Higgins Mueller Trust regarding a 577-unit Arlington Heights neighborhood project.

The vote by the four volunteer commissioners, whose role is to hear appeals of developments, kills a project the City Council and Planning Commission approved of in June, city officials confirmed after the meeting.

The granting of a project appeal is exceedingly rare, Faisal Roble, a principal city planner, said after the meeting. Roble could not immediately recall another instance of it happening.

Roble testified during the fractious public meeting that the city never scrutinized the project too closely, because the Gabay development team never applied for a zoning variance.

“We didn’t look at this because it didn’t ask for anything,” Roble said.

That city approach, however, may soon be changing, as city officials join community activists in criticizing developers who do not propose affordable housing set asides.

Council President Herb Wesson, whose 10th district includes the Gabay’s nixed project at Obama and Crenshaw, came out against the project in September. Wesson has even proposed a citywide program effectively requiring all new developments to have affordable housing set asides.

Wesson was not at the meeting, but his view carried the day as public speakers and even commissioners railed against market-rate developments. “The applicant has no sympathy for us,” commissioner Antoinette Anderson said to applause regarding the Gabay team. “I feel the applicant needs to have a heart.”

Todd Nelson, a lawyer at Armbruster Goldsmith & Delvac, represented the developer at the hearing, and declined to take questions after the meeting, including whether the Gabays may go back to the drawing board, or file a lawsuit against the city.

The Gabays, who often do business under West Hollywood-headquartered Charles Company, first proposed a mostly retail project on Crenshaw and Rodeo (subsequently named Obama) boulevards in 2010, but later switched gears to residential.

Damian Goodmon, who testified Tuesday on behalf of the Crenshaw Subway Coalition, said that local community members at first didn’t give the project much thought, believing it would be mostly shops.

However, Arman Gabay, and his developments, gained more scrutiny last year when federal officials arrested Gabay on charges of bribing a Los Angeles County official. A trial is pending.

The bribery case took a backseat Tuesday to appellants demands for affordable housing, though allusions were made. “I don’t want to say too much,” Goodmon deadpanned at one point, “Because I know someone from the FBI is here,”

The post City of LA nixes 600-unit Gabay resi project on appeal appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 19 November 2019
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Rising Realty fills Park Calabasas with latest big lease →← Here are the priciest residential listings in LA County last week
  • Recent Posts

    • Terreno Realty nabs Orange County Home Depot for $50M June 24, 2025
    • Case Study 2.0 aims for swift Palisades, Altadena rebuild minus “cookie-cutter” look June 24, 2025
    • MG Properties drops $144M for Anaheim apartment complex June 24, 2025
    • Affinius Capital injects $55M investment into Latigo Group housing plans June 24, 2025
    • LA City Council rescinds Hollywood hotel approval after legal defeat June 23, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • June 2025
      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM