• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Major hotel chains named in sex trafficking lawsuits

Survivors accused Hilton, Marriott, Wyndham and others of knowing about sex trafficking on the property and still financially benefitting (Credit: Wikipedia Commons, iStock)
Survivors accused Hilton, Marriott, Wyndham and others of knowing about sex trafficking on the property and still financially benefitting (Credit: Wikipedia Commons, iStock)

Some of the biggest hotel companies in the world are named in dozens of lawsuits of ignoring clear signs of human trafficking.

More than 40 federal suits claim that hotel companies an franchises profitted from sex-trafficking operations, and were either aware of it or should have been, according to the Wall Street Journal.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc., Marriott International Inc. , Wyndham Hotels and Resorts Inc. are among the companies named in the lawsuits.

In one case, a woman only identified by her initials, S.Y., describes her traumatic three months when she was forced into prostitution in Naples, Florida. One night, a woman was left in a hotel bathtub unconscious, which caused a flood, she said. S.Y. called the front-desk manager.

“He didn’t come to help the girl in the bathtub,” S.Y. told the Journal. “He came to clean up the water.”

Another survivor identified as H.H., claimed in her lawsuit that a hotel worker in Columbus, Ohio, found her chained to the bathroom and then again found her chained to a bed in another room.

Over 40 of the lawsuits were filed in federal courts but others are suing specific hotels where they allege they were trafficked. The federal suits rely on the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act, which was was amended in 2008 to allow civil suits against those who “knew or should have known” about sex trafficking and financially benefited from the occurance.

The suits claim that hotel workers should have known about online reviews which mention prostitution and clear signs of trafficking such as excessive requests for sheets and towels or paying for the room in cash.

The hotel chains have argued that, generally speaking, they have no control over what happens at franchised hotels and have asked judges to dismiss the suits.

Hilton and Wyndham declined to comment on the allegations presented by S.Y.

“We require all our hotels, including franchises, to conduct training on identifying the signs of human trafficking and on how to report them,” a spokesperson for Hilton said. Along the same line, Marriott said it has trained over 700,000 hotel employees to recognize signs of human trafficking.

“If you can control the thread count of the bed sheets or the furniture in the lobby, you can control what mandates you are giving for anti-trafficking policies and efforts,” Kim Adams, Florida-based lawyer whose firm represents trafficked women in Ohio and California, told the Journal. [WSJ] — Jacqueline Flynn

The post Major hotel chains named in sex trafficking lawsuits appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 04 March 2020
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Multifamily firm Kaplan pays $48M for Warner Center retail site →← SoftBank-backed Oyo slashes staff, eyes profitability
  • Recent Posts

    • Reality TV personalities Heidi Montag, Spencer Pratt can’t afford to rebuild Palisades home May 19, 2025
    • Historic Fairfax Theatre looks for buyer to drop $45M May 19, 2025
    • Developers sue Beverly Hills after builder’s remedy applications denied May 19, 2025
    • Construction, gridlock don’t stop retail players from getting to ICSC Las Vegas May 19, 2025
    • Celebrity restaurants at hotels drive up average room rates, revenue May 19, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM