• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Realogy stock hits all-time low

Realogy CEO Ryan Schneider (Credit: iStock)

Realogy’s stock plunged 21 percent on Tuesday, as Wall Street reacted grimly to the company’s dismal earnings report.

The stock closed at $14.14 per share after a volatile day of trading, down nearly 42 percent year-over-year, and its lowest mark yet. The New Jersey-based conglomerate reported Tuesday that its 2018 profits dropped 68 percent to $137 million, and it lost $22 million during the fourth quarter. For the full year, Realogy reported $6.1 billion in revenue, $35 million less than 2017.

“Most of the challenge in the 2018 market showed up in the last half of the year,” CEO Ryan Schneider said during an earnings call, in which he attributed the weak earnings to the slow U.S. housing market.

As its share price took a nosedive, Realogy’s market cap dropped to just $1.67 billion, down from $2.1 billion on Monday. Throughout the day, investors also bought and sold 12.7 million shares of the company’s stock, compared to an average daily volume of 1.9 million.

At its peak, Realogy’s market cap was $7.5 billion in May 2013, roughly a year after going public, according to the research firm Macrotrends. But the value of the company has declined precipitously over the past few years, amid heightened competition and the high cost of agent commissions, which increased by $52 million last year. Realogy’s market cap dropped to $3.32 billion in February 2018, according to Macrotrends. By comparison, Realogy’s venture-backed rival Compass was valued at $4.4 billion in 2018, after closing a Series F from SoftBank and the Qatar Investment Authority in September.

On Tuesday, Realogy executives said they’ve been investing in agent recruitment tools and other marketing and technology to improve their value proposition to agents. They’re also looking to cut $70 million in costs in 2019 and reduce the company’s debt load. “In the first half of the year, you will see us focus on debt paydown,” interim CFO Tim Gustavson said.

But analysts zeroed in on Realogy’s lackluster performance compared to the national average. In 2018, Realogy’s total transaction volume dropped 5 percent year-over-year. Nationwide, sales volume dropped 4 percent, according to the National Association of Realtors.

“Realogy missed analyst expectations on the top and bottom lines — badly,” wrote Matthew Frankel, an investor advisor and founder of Frankel Wealth Management in South Carolina, in a recap of the company’s earnings published on the Motley Fool.

Schneider said the steeper-than-average sales volume was a result of regional weakness. “New York remained pretty weak in Q4. California was incredibly weak, and we’re over-weighted in both of those related to NAR and our competitors,” he told analysts during the earnings call.

Not all analysts were buying it. JPMorgan’s Anthony Palone said Realogy’s financial results weren’t much worse than expected considering the national housing data of late. But he noted that as brokerage companies invest in “agent centric” models, it’s the agents who stand to gain the most — not shareholders.

“With the residential brokerage brands also pushing hard to keep their share of (and grow) agents, the agents are getting a lot out of the deal,” Palone said. “We wonder when will the shareholders of the brands be rewarded?”

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 26 February 2019
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
L.A. Clippers, city, worried MSG would learn of Inglewood arena plans →← Steve Wynn takes control of “Girls Gone Wild” creator’s Bel Air mansion
  • Recent Posts

    • Hoteliers sound the alarm on looming distress  May 24, 2025
    • Growth markets see retail boom even with tariff uncertainty May 24, 2025
    • Westchester resi project gets city OK after union drops objection May 23, 2025
    • WATCH: ‘Father of CMBS’ Ethan Penner to run for governor of California May 23, 2025
    • Fashion Island office fetches $756 psf May 23, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM