• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Redfin’s latest challenge: Defending its employment practices in court

Redfin's Glenn Kelman
Redfin’s Glenn Kelman

In his one year as a Redfin agent in San Diego County, Jason Bell said the brokerage failed to pay him minimum wage or overtime and did not allow for meal and rest breaks as guaranteed by the state.

Those are among the California labor law violations Bell is accusing Redfin of in a federal lawsuit he filed Friday in the Southern District. Bell, who was fired from the company in December 2019, seeks class action status for his suit.

Bell’s complaint shines a light on the brokerage and listing platform’s unique employment practices.

Redfin stands out among brokerages for classifying many of its agents as salaried employees, not independent contractors. That was the case with Bell, who started with the company in November 2018, according to the lawsuit. Under his employment contract, Bell alleges he had over 40 hours a week worth of obligations to Redfin, and often worked 60 to 80 hours a week, according to the suit.

He claims Redfin did not compensate him for the additional hours, and, in fact, was paying him much less than California’s $12 an hour minimum wage. His salary, he alleges, was $12,000 for the year.

Then in March 2019, Redfin “improperly switched plaintiff from an employee to independent contractor position, in order to avoid” meeting California labor standards, the complaint claims. “However…the defendant maintained the same level of control over the plaintiff,” even after Bell became an independent contractor, the suit alleges.

Bell said Redin fired him after the company received a complaint he was late to a home showing; he denies he was late.

The complaint is the latest challenge for the Seattle-based company in what has been a tumultuous year industrywide. Redfin furloughed 40 percent of its agents in March as the pandemic was taking hold — it rehired 83 percent by late July — and more recently faced charges of unfair treatment against minority employees. After a difficult second quarter, Redfin rebounded in Q3, posting $32.4 million in net income on $237 million in revenue.

Redfin did not respond to messages.

Bell now works at LightHaus Realty, a brokerage in Poway on the outskirts of San Diego. Messages left with Bell and his lawyer, Abbas Kazerounian, were not returned.

The post Redfin’s latest challenge: Defending its employment practices in court appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 23 November 2020
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
What doom-and-gloom forecasts miss about the office market →← RMBS then and now: Do securitized home loans still matter?
  • Recent Posts

    • Hoteliers sound the alarm on looming distress  May 24, 2025
    • Growth markets see retail boom even with tariff uncertainty May 24, 2025
    • Westchester resi project gets city OK after union drops objection May 23, 2025
    • WATCH: ‘Father of CMBS’ Ethan Penner to run for governor of California May 23, 2025
    • Fashion Island office fetches $756 psf May 23, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM