• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Anaheim may stick Angels with major stadium upgrade costs

From left: Council Member Jose F. Moreno and Arte Moreno with 2000 Gene Autry Way
From left: Council Member Jose F. Moreno and Arte Moreno with 2000 Gene Autry Way (Major League Baseball, Getty, Anaheim)

A potential sale of the Angels could come with a large added cost.

The city of Anaheim could mull if the Major League Baseball team should pick up the tab for as much as $300 million in Angel Stadium upgrades, the Los Angeles Times reported.

The City Council will meet next week to decide whether to commission a study “in anticipation of potential litigation” that one councilman says could force the team to pay the bill.

The city estimated in 2013 the stadium would need between $130 million and $150 million for maintenance, repairs and renovations over the next two decades. That estimate is “easily double” now, Anaheim spokesman Mike Lyster told the Orange County Register in August.

The proposed study would provide a detailed assessment of the city-owned stadium property.

The Angels’ lease requires the team to pay the “sole expense” of ballpark maintenance and upkeep, aside from a specific city contribution each year. The team has made $54.5 million in capital repairs and improvements since 2002, including $12.3 million paid by the city, the Times reported. Arte Moreno bought the team in 2003.

The lease directs the Angels to maintain the stadium “at least equal to first class professional baseball stadiums, such as, on the date hereof, Kansas City and Dodger stadiums.” The lease was signed in 1996, and a $117-million renovation of Angel Stadium was done in 1998.

Since then, the Kansas City Royals’ stadium has received a $250-million upgrade paid for by local taxpayers, and the Dodgers’ owners have spent $350 million on renovations at Dodger Stadium.

Now Anaheim is looking to hold its team to those standards.

In October, Councilman Jose Moreno said the city “should look” to enforce its lease. City attorney Robert Fabela said enforcement could include asking a court to order compliance with a lease and award a payment for damages.

It’s not clear whether a court would say if Angel Stadium needed to be maintained on par with the Royals’ and Dodger stadiums in 1996, or if a court would consider the ballparks as examples of first-class stadiums now.

It’s also not clear whether the council other than Jose Moreno wants to pursue action against the Angels. Moreno, who adamantly opposed the now-dead $320-million sale of the stadium and surrounding parking lots to unrelated Arte Moreno, leaves office next month.

A sale of the Angels is expected to fetch at least $2.5 billion, a record price for a MLB team. The Angels’ lease — including a potential stadium upgrades bill for hundreds of millions — automatically transfers to any new owner approved by the league.

This means a new owner would likely ask its current to assume any liability for the matter — or discount the purchase price accordingly, according to the Times.

— Dana Bartholomew

[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]
Read more
  • LA Times’ owner Soon-Shiong ponders bid for Angels
  • Potential sale of Angels Baseball triggers stadium speculation
  • Long Beach ready to pitch for Angels

The post Anaheim may stick Angels with major stadium upgrade costs appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 11 November 2022
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
KBS sees “no assurance” Joel Schreiber will close Union Bank Plaza purchase →← Crane Worldwide leases 378K sf warehouse in Anaheim
  • Recent Posts

    • CIM Group buys WeHo apartments across from its Lot at Formosa property July 23, 2026
    • Rexford posts $500M loss, says write-downs to blame July 23, 2026
    • Kennedy Wilson pitches mixed-income multifamily in downtown Santa Monica July 23, 2026
    • Silver screen: Sony plots revival of Cinerama Dome as it diversifies with entertainment venues July 23, 2026
    • LA County signs off on housing, commercial expansion at Willowbrook campus July 22, 2026
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • July 2026
      • June 2026
      • May 2026
      • April 2026
      • March 2026
      • February 2026
      • January 2026
      • December 2025
      • November 2025
      • October 2025
      • September 2025
      • August 2025
      • July 2025
      • June 2025
      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2026 GPAM